Skip to main content

Better Than That

Last week the people of Walthamstow, somewhere i've never been, stood against the knuckle draggers of the EDL. They made a stand against fascism and in particular the confused, media manipulated, ideology of a group of idiots and thugs who lack not just the intelligence buyt more importantly the will to stand up and think for themselves. Unfortunately this happened.

Understand this: I have no sympathy for the EDL and their shady leader 'tommy robinson' (which isn't his real name either, it's Stephen Yaxley Lennon). I am not going to waste my breath excoriating his ignorance and the antics of those that idolise this clown. Their actions are worthy of the same criticism as the moron that threw a brick that could have killed someone. There is no excuse for this. 

Of course I must caveat that by saying I do not know who threw that brick; I am open to believing it could have come from someone that had nothing to do with the UAF, it could have come from a Muslim just as it could have come from a non-Muslim. It could even have come from an agent provocateur - I've heard too many stories about such behaviour to regard the existence of such people as political myths. 

However there is no excuse for stooping to the same level as the sort of neanderthal scum that behave like this. That's what the EDL are capable of, we don't need to become them to fight them. I get that the left has a serious disadvantage in this day and age, after decades of capitalist right wing propaganda and divide and rule. But if we play their game their way, we give them all the ammunition they will ever need. That, in my view, is a price worth paying. Maybe, as a white non Muslim person, that's easy for me to say; I can only speak for myself. 

What will happen is this: the EDL will call the protesters, tarring the whole community with the same brush (they aren't smart enough to do any less), apologists for terrorism and 'islamists' (whatever that actually means). The attitude of the right towards the Muslim community is typically fascist (and I am no fan of any organised religion, by the way). 

In the post 9-11 climate it has constantly demanded that it police itself. The right always demands that moderate members of the Muslim community do the job of rooting out the radical elements. This is a dangerously alluring argument but ti's pure divide and rule; it's the same argument that's used to justify confidential phone lines to shop people that might be committing benefit fraud. It's the same that informs people attacking their disabled neighbours. And of course the right doesn't believe there are moderate Muslims precisely because, in their eyes, the Muslim community doesn't police itself.

Of course there are radical elements in any and all communities: the EDL is proof of that. Consequently the brick throwing could be easily explained if not completely justified. But if the left is going to allow such spectacular own goals then it opens itself to that kind of fascist criticism and that cannot be allowed.

Don't get me wrong; don't ever make the mistake of thinking I'm not hardline when it comes to revolutionary politics in this country. We need a sea change in just about every aspect of society; we need better attitudes toward everyone. We have got to move away from the politics of envy, scarcity, fear, division and competition, and toward a society where people do not judge each other, do not seek to set people against each other and where there is abundance and compassion. Those are values I find at odds with throwing bricks at cretins. 

Don't also make the mistake of thinking me naive. I don't claim to be a scholar of any kind of political thinker or expert. I have never read Marx. I know what I know from my own reading and experience and from there I make my stand. I am intrinsically aligned to the left because I find the politics of the right to be fundamentally flawed and destructive: exactly the qualities I list above. I also understand that getting rid of those qualities will be difficult precisely ebcause the left is at a disadvantage thanks mainly to the power of the media and the politics of the forces that dominate and control it. But we cannot resort to street thuggery, we really can't. That's the purview of the EDL and groups like them, and they alone are more than enough.


  1. I passionately believe that everyone has a right to say whatever they want, however dumb and stupid it is, So violence in any form just polarises the community. We should see and laugh at the poisonous tripe the EDL is spouting, not throwing bricks. The benefits of freedom of speech is that everyone has a right to speak, the perils are everyone has a right to speak.

    1. I agree, but unfortunately it's not that simple. We have to hope that the people the EDL preach their stupid ignorant crap toward are smart enough to reject it and see them for what they are. Unfortunately their very existence proves that not all of those they talk to are that smart. Free speech assumes a basic level of intelligence.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Fucking Hate the Work Programme

That did not go well.
My legs were wobbly to begin with as I closed in on the church that passes for the office of the employment wing of the Salvation Army. My appointment was 3 to half past. I really did feel sick. Pretty early on, when he asked for the forms he gave me last time to fill in, I knew that what was arranged on the letter (a short interview with me bringing my CV and jobsearch) was actually going to be much longer. I also knew that, come half three when I had to leave to catch my bus back ten minutes later, I was going to have problems. 
Unfortunately, though more for me I fear, it never got that far; at 20 past he terminated the interview citing my apparent 'putting up barriers' as the reason not to continue. This was because I refused consent for him to keep my CV. I asked why he needed it and offered, three times, to show it to him (that's all), he said it was to apply for jobs on my behalf. The EEC's need this information.
What's an EEC? Employm…

I Hate James Bartholomew

Know the Tory mindset: according to these creatures welfare breeds dependency. Meanwhile they do not want to set a minimum wage, they do not want to create legislation to protect the un - and under - employed from the predations of the system they benefit from. That word is chosen deliberately, because they like benefits for themselves - the ability to sack whom they like, when they like and how they like. In this UKIP are the same. This is the febrile heart of the right wing.
Yesterday on 5 Live's laughable morning phone in - bigots drink for free - another right wing excuse for a human, James Bartholomew, revealed another aspect of their nasty prejudice and staggering ignorance. Not surprisingly this vile creature was once a banker. He writes (if one can call it that) for the Telegraph and though I don't know the content of his ballot paper, I dare say I can guess. He props up every tory myth about the unemployed and welfare with dull witted aplomb.
He believes people have …

Magical Thinking

Well that's that for pursuing a diagnosis for Aspergers or anything remotely similar.

I contacted the Patient Advisory Liaison Service (PALS) to try and sort this out after being lied to by the clinician regarding referring me to the ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder) people. That never happened and she continues to deny saying she would. Of course I cannot prove this and so the patient-doctor dynamic kicks in: I'm the lowly patient, she's the expert doctor, her reputation versus mine and so who wins?

I could make a complaint, but what would be the point. I might get a nice letter in a few months time saying sorry in a mealy mouthed way, but it doesn't get me any closer to what I need. That being a diagnosis, a formal, written and recorded, recognition of the issues I deal with. Lacking that, dealing with the systems in society, chiefly the DWP, becomes more difficult. Unfortunately the medical profession doesn't seem to care about that.

We have a society fuelled by …