Skip to main content

Safe & Insecure



This is annoying I can’t access my blog from the local library because it’s behind an ‘unsuitable content’ wall. So because of a few choice words the overzealous pedants at the library have neutered their service completely even though I can get a book of the shelf that has explicit sex scenes or equally choice language. Work that out?

I have just signed on, successfully thank fuck. I have been fretting about this ever since last time when I stupidly said I’d heard nothing from the Work Programme since April. This time I lied and said I’d left a message. Unfortunately the adviser took a note of this which may have repercussions, the least of which being that the useless god botherers may well get back in touch. I’m more worried that as there’s no trace of me leaving a message I will get into trouble. Oh well, fuck it. The whole system is weighted against us there’s only so long before the friction catches up with me. No one’s interested in the fact the Salvation Army are inept and deliberately unhelpful. They will just focus on me not contacting them and thus me being seen as refusing help. There’s nothing I can do about it and I’m certainly not wasting my time chasing up an organisation who, by their own admission, is no help.

I also had to sign for receipt of a document. This is similar to the sanction letter we all received a couple of months back detailing, in the wake of the Cait Reilly case, the rules for sanctions. Since the regime changes in a couple of weeks this letter contains the updated facts (i.e. the harsher regime). I’m still not convinced I should have signed for this, but I guess I had no choice. Hopefully it won’t come back to bite me on the arse. The letter is genuine, but who can take anything the DWP/Government says as fact these days. On one hand I’m relieved to have gotten today’s signing over without undue hassle, but on the other I feel no less stressed than when I got up – you just can’t drop your guard with these people for a second, no matter what they say or how they seem. As another day goes by I find nothing surprises me anymore about this system: we receive our handout, Oliver Twist style, and then made to feel guilty if we spend it and frightened if we spend too much.

Comments

  1. It appears we sign on the same day - and I too received the letter detailing the new sanctions regime. Unbelievable, is the word I'd use - not least the fact people can be sanctioned for leaving a job "voluntarily". Surely that criterion is open to all sorts of abuse as a reason to deny someone benefits. What if someone was badly treated in a particular job and left for their own health's sake, but didn't feel it was worth pursuing through a tribunal? Especially since the tories are now keen to limit peoples' rights to access industrial tribunals in the first place. No, this system is getting ridiculously harsh, and I think many people will find it impossible to keep claiming benefits at all and will simply sign-off; no doubt this is the government's aim...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, this is about finding as many ways to trip or trick people out of benefits as possible. This is how they cut the budget. It's why i say it's only a matter of time before we all fall foul of it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Fucking Hate the Work Programme

That did not go well.
My legs were wobbly to begin with as I closed in on the church that passes for the office of the employment wing of the Salvation Army. My appointment was 3 to half past. I really did feel sick. Pretty early on, when he asked for the forms he gave me last time to fill in, I knew that what was arranged on the letter (a short interview with me bringing my CV and jobsearch) was actually going to be much longer. I also knew that, come half three when I had to leave to catch my bus back ten minutes later, I was going to have problems. 
Unfortunately, though more for me I fear, it never got that far; at 20 past he terminated the interview citing my apparent 'putting up barriers' as the reason not to continue. This was because I refused consent for him to keep my CV. I asked why he needed it and offered, three times, to show it to him (that's all), he said it was to apply for jobs on my behalf. The EEC's need this information.
What's an EEC? Employm…

I Hate James Bartholomew

Know the Tory mindset: according to these creatures welfare breeds dependency. Meanwhile they do not want to set a minimum wage, they do not want to create legislation to protect the un - and under - employed from the predations of the system they benefit from. That word is chosen deliberately, because they like benefits for themselves - the ability to sack whom they like, when they like and how they like. In this UKIP are the same. This is the febrile heart of the right wing.
Yesterday on 5 Live's laughable morning phone in - bigots drink for free - another right wing excuse for a human, James Bartholomew, revealed another aspect of their nasty prejudice and staggering ignorance. Not surprisingly this vile creature was once a banker. He writes (if one can call it that) for the Telegraph and though I don't know the content of his ballot paper, I dare say I can guess. He props up every tory myth about the unemployed and welfare with dull witted aplomb.
He believes people have …

Still Going

I started this blog thinking I could do something useful, provide some decent citizen journalism, or at the very least offer something credible for, at the risk of stroking my own ego, posterity. But in truth I have found it very difficult to keep up with my own standards. This is true of all the writing I engage in. It isn't that I don't enjoy it, or that I don't know how (YMMV), but that I just struggle to maintain the concentration. This is part of the problem, mental health-wise, that I have tried to address in recent years; all to no avail. Unfortunately it is simply perceived as an excuse by our society. In response to that, I offer none. I am what I am, and if that means I'm lazy then lazy I must be.

I was due to have a WCA on the 7th; instead I rang and said I couldn't go through with it and that they could pursue whatever consequences they saw fit. Curiously they offered me the opportunity to postpone the interview, which I did, though I'm not sure why…