He’s proud of his welfare reforms
because they are helping people.
He’s proud of his policies
because previous government(s) left the sick and the feeble to fester and rot.
He’s Iain Duncan Smith, and he’s
changing all that.
So he says; I don’t feel terribly
helped.
I attended his Work Programme,
but not solely through choice. There was choice, to be sure – the choice
between that, Work Choices (the same thing but only for 6 months and then onto
the Work Programme, or…) or a sanction. So I chose his scheme but the choice of
provider and the availability of different provisions, perhaps specialising in
particular issues needs or aspects, was not mine to make. There were two
providers, both carbon copies of the same model; different names, different faces,
same service – or lack thereof. At no point was I offered any kind of
prospectus, and at no point was I offered any say in how my future was to be
built. I was not consulted and my best interests were not, and are not being
discussed.
I was bullied by Work Programme
advisers who not only, according to their own head office, went against their
procedures, but ignored my needs. Again my will, wishes and wants are ignored.
Mr Smith exhorts his Work Programme on the basis that, as Tory propaganda
claims for all their policies, it empowers the individual. No more will they
languish and idle, instead they are at the heart of their own development. But
there is no development and there is no choice. A so called ‘black box’
approach is talked about wherever the WP is mentioned, but it doesn’t exist.
Instead there are rules – compliance – and lots of it. Only they do not tell
you this and you find not only are your expectations shattered – you don’t have
any say in building your own future – but that if you do not do as you are told
you will be sanctioned. This transcends cognitive dissonance; it is downright
abuse. It most certainly is not help.
I haven’t heard from the Work Programme
since just before my WCA. It is clear they have nothing to offer, but of course
that cannot be seen as their failing. The individual is always to blame: that’s
what is meant by the black box approach. You are responsible for your own
future. After all if Tory millionaires can succeed to the highest offices in
the land, why can’t people with nothing? Why can’t people at the frayed fringes
of society that don’t have all the advantages commensurate with being part of
the aristocracy or the elite?
I attended my WCA but again not
through choice, even though the mere act of doing so precludes me from being
eligible for ESA, the whole point of the
test. The assessment, as discussed, has nothing to do with health. You may
provide genuine clinical evidence, from real qualified people, and it will have
no bearing per se on the outcome. Instead you are to tick a series of boxes
whose accumulated value must total the arbitrary sum of 15. Anything less and
your ‘limited capability for work’ (the title of the assessment) is deemed not
limited enough – not matter what the conditions or evidence may say otherwise. None
of this is informed by or has any relation to the conditions in the labour
market at the time. The test will be the same next year as it was previously
even though the labour market is not. If you can tie your own shoes and write
your own name and understand the question you are being asked, you can not only
function in that labour market, but you can do so competitively. To reinforce
the point your income is instantly stopped; you are not even transferred over
to the Jobseeker’s Allowance you will now need (unless you brought a winning
lotto ticket with your last ESA payment).
That is what Duncan Smith calls help. That is the support that lies behind the
bellicose bullshit pumped out from government.
You can appeal – but wait, what’s
that chill in the air? It’s the Ghost of Sanctions Future; the sound of
disapproving Tory ministers who’d rather you took their medicine and stopped
scrounging – no matter the consequence. So you are fragile, you are fraught and
insecure. They don’t want you to appeal. The process itself is mysterious and
vague, with no definition. It is amorphous: you are to provide further evidence
but you are not told how, or by when. No one contacts you. This is one of the
system’s major failings: there is simply no communication at all; not between
you, the DWP, the decision makers, and the doctors or clinicians. I cannot, for
example, ask them to perhaps wait until I can be seen by the NHS for the
diagnosis I hope I can get. I think we can imagine what the answer will be, if
I were to do so. It is compartmentalised and serviced by equally small minded
jobsworths: the rules are the rules. Instead I have to go through a laborious
process like a blindfolded rat in a maze in order to at least try and find some
means to move forward. This must be costing the government money, is there no
better way? No! This is helping me! It’s stopping me from rotting and festering,
remember? Where help and advice are needed the DWP tell you to speak to the CAB
– isn’t that incredible: they themselves offer no help to you with their
processes when you deal with them. Meanwhile they continue. I wait for my
appointment with the CAB while the DWP make a decision before an appointment is
even available. This system is a series of cogs, all different sizes all moving
at different speeds, all failing to integrate. You are being driven by that
machine as it slowly falters and fails. That is your life as helped by Iain
Duncan Smith and his irresponsible, ignorant, greedy cohorts.
Sooner or later that machine will
not only crash, it will explode. People are already dying. They are already
being sucked into the cogs and crushed by the weight of bureaucratic insanity
and cold corporate indifference, all informed by unelected ministers with too
much power and too much privilege, or the fruits of selfish Tory middle Englanders
whose prejudices and fear are amplified by the media the Tories use to reinforce
those prejudices and fears. In short, I don’t see any kind of future at all. We
are done. We are undone.
You might be interested to read Lloyd Biggle's short story, Beachhead in Utopia; in which if you find yourself unemployed you have a set timeframe to find another job, otherwise you're killed. There are a number of agencies which form a huge bureaucracy, seemingly designed to obstruct rather than help. And lots of perfectly "innocent" administrative errors...
ReplyDeleteThe only reason that isn't happening now is that the government probably thinks it cheaper to let people starve.
Delete