Skip to main content

Final Assessment



“Reaction time is a factor in this so please pay attention. Answer as quickly as you can.”

On Thursday I had my third, and final (I'm told) diagnostic appointment. This comprised three specific tests/parts:

First 20 questions based on a piece of film were asked. This was a short clip of some people arranging and getting together for a dinner. The questions were asked at various points during the footage, which was paused. The purpose, I guess, was to determine how you can read their feelings and reactions. This seemed to be the function of all three tests, though who knows. It didn't help that the footage was dubbed - really badly; I mean the voicing was really ham fisted and over the top which I don't think really helped. It felt like a mini - and quite predictable - soap vignette. Person A fancies person B who secretly doesn't fancy him, but fancies person C. The end. It just didn't feel representative of real life to me. Perhaps that's the point.

“Maybe you're fed up; maybe you want to be by yourself...who knows. So you look down and see a tortoise. It's crawling toward you...”

Test two was a rather hard to follow series of short paragraph long scenarios read from a booklet (I was given a copy to follow). The purpose was to determine whether someone said anything inappropriate. So you'd have Jane commenting that Sally's wedding present was shit - while Sally was stood there or unaware that Sally was in the next room and could hear, etc. Not all situations were inappropriate. Some of them didn't seem inappropriate to me for reasons of genuine non-malice or just bad luck (how was Jane to know Sally was in the next room). I also had to answer questions about details in the story despite that I had the booklet in my hand and could look up the answer instantly. I found this quite exhausting actually; my concentration severely waned during the 20 questions.

Finally I had about 30 pictures of a person's eyes (a different person each time) surrounded by 5 or so possible emotions from which I had to circle which was correct according to the eyes. Apparently no one gets this 100% correct.

“Tell me the good things that come into your mind about…your mother.”

Now I have to wait for the outcome. I don't really hold out much hope. I don't think this process is really oriented for adults, as opposed to kids, and it's so removed from the situation people face in dealing with, for example, the likes of the DWP, that I don't think they really understand. That's not to be malicious, it's just pragmatic.

“They're just questions, Leon. In answer to your query, they're written down for me. It's a test designed to provoke an emotional response.”

So what happens now? Well after a mini meltdown in which I tried to express how shit the system is to the psychologist (who seemed a good sort; I’ve nothing bad to say about any of the people I’ve seen), I can’t help assuming that they aren’t going to give me what I want.

Throughout all of these processes I think the prudent approach is to hope for the best but expect the worst. The fundamental problem, however, is that the psychologist and the DWP are totally different entities, and neither are connected. What is needed is a holistic approach – not just here but throughout all of society. People’s health issues, mental difficulties, or just everyday personal struggles are not easily dismissed in defensive terms by people hiding their own insecurities (as I’ve previously theorised). They are genuine battles fought within the confines of one’s own skin to which the world beyond is largely deaf and blind.

When dealing with other agencies, such as those necessary to one’s own survival (such as the DWP), it becomes even more fraught. For example, someone happy to hold down any job who feels none of these issues is much more likely to get employed than someone who is at war with himself or the world because of these kinds of difficulties (and not through choice). Even worse, the latter has to compete in this capitalist system just the same as the former – while still struggling. It’s like having to race against someone to win the prize, only your running shoes are made of stone and broken glass.

“My mother... I'll tell you about my mother.”


Comments

  1. The DWP does seem to be moving towards some form of personality profiling though. I had to do a Jobs Seminar a few weeks ago, organised by the local benefits office, during which I had to complete the Myers-Briggs personality test. I've done this test before under other circumstances (I'm always INFP) but I found it very worrying that the DWP now have a psychological test which has been endorsed by them - because they have tried it on claimants. I tried to pin this down, but they were clever about it. The guy who conducted the test was a consultant they'd brought in, and who worked for one of these parasite agencies which make their money from human misery and unemployment. He does the test and simply passes the result onto the DWP, and they pass the result onto me. But I wonder just how the result will affect their attitude towards me and my employment prospects, if any.

    Anyway, good luck with your results.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is just sinister. I can't really imagine what they hope to achieve from these tests? That online test from a year ago was a farce: all possible permuations of response led to the same 'diagnosis', and for what? Presumably so they can simply tell you that you're fit for work.

      Delete
  2. The excuse for doing such a test was that it would make it easier to direct us towards suitable jobs, as though the country were coming down with vacancies, and such a selection process were necessary. Personally I thought that the other side of the coin was more plausible - that the results would find their way into the hands of workfare providers who can then apply pressure to those people who tested as shy or vulnerable or nervous types. I am all of those things, but I can also discipline myself to be defiant, simply because I've made myself aware of their game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find this all deeply sinister.

      What a complete waste of time.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Fucking Hate the Work Programme

That did not go well.
My legs were wobbly to begin with as I closed in on the church that passes for the office of the employment wing of the Salvation Army. My appointment was 3 to half past. I really did feel sick. Pretty early on, when he asked for the forms he gave me last time to fill in, I knew that what was arranged on the letter (a short interview with me bringing my CV and jobsearch) was actually going to be much longer. I also knew that, come half three when I had to leave to catch my bus back ten minutes later, I was going to have problems. 
Unfortunately, though more for me I fear, it never got that far; at 20 past he terminated the interview citing my apparent 'putting up barriers' as the reason not to continue. This was because I refused consent for him to keep my CV. I asked why he needed it and offered, three times, to show it to him (that's all), he said it was to apply for jobs on my behalf. The EEC's need this information.
What's an EEC? Employm…

I Hate James Bartholomew

Know the Tory mindset: according to these creatures welfare breeds dependency. Meanwhile they do not want to set a minimum wage, they do not want to create legislation to protect the un - and under - employed from the predations of the system they benefit from. That word is chosen deliberately, because they like benefits for themselves - the ability to sack whom they like, when they like and how they like. In this UKIP are the same. This is the febrile heart of the right wing.
Yesterday on 5 Live's laughable morning phone in - bigots drink for free - another right wing excuse for a human, James Bartholomew, revealed another aspect of their nasty prejudice and staggering ignorance. Not surprisingly this vile creature was once a banker. He writes (if one can call it that) for the Telegraph and though I don't know the content of his ballot paper, I dare say I can guess. He props up every tory myth about the unemployed and welfare with dull witted aplomb.
He believes people have …

Magical Thinking

Well that's that for pursuing a diagnosis for Aspergers or anything remotely similar.

I contacted the Patient Advisory Liaison Service (PALS) to try and sort this out after being lied to by the clinician regarding referring me to the ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder) people. That never happened and she continues to deny saying she would. Of course I cannot prove this and so the patient-doctor dynamic kicks in: I'm the lowly patient, she's the expert doctor, her reputation versus mine and so who wins?

I could make a complaint, but what would be the point. I might get a nice letter in a few months time saying sorry in a mealy mouthed way, but it doesn't get me any closer to what I need. That being a diagnosis, a formal, written and recorded, recognition of the issues I deal with. Lacking that, dealing with the systems in society, chiefly the DWP, becomes more difficult. Unfortunately the medical profession doesn't seem to care about that.

We have a society fuelled by …