I do not want to dwell on the
particulars of the murder of Stephanie Bottrill for two reasons: firstly it
feels somewhat distasteful to bandy about the name of someone I have never met,
and secondly because suicide is not painless. I use the word murder quite
deliberately; austerity is being inflicted deliberately to cold effect. These
people know what they are doing and incidents such as this as merely collateral
damage to them. I’m afraid that is unacceptable; there must be some
accountability and so I use a deliberately emotive and provocative term.
Murder.
However, that aside, what is
beginning to become clear is that when incidents such as these occur it is very
easy to traduce them by way of mental instability. Mrs Bottrill must have had
something wrong with her, specifically something psychological – mental – for
her to take this course of action. This is reasoned out using the same mob
tactics and fallacies that are always used: other
people aren’t killing themselves, and other
people are struggling. So the system, the status quo, avoids blame by
effectively weeding out the ‘weakest’ and blaming it on imagined failings.
It may have been that she was
particularly sensitive. I do not know, so no more can I say. There is nothing
wrong with being sensitive; indeed it should be a respected quality of empathy
and understanding that would help our society. Instead it is a weakness; one
must be callous in order to succeed. The message from the government
responsible for this tragedy is that she was at fault – or that the failings of
her psychology are the problem. No matter how light a touch in delivering that
message her failings individually are the catalyst; not the austerity, the
forced impoverishment of everyday folk.
The system will not accept blame,
and nor will its adherents. My greatest fear regarding the implementation of
this nasty bedroom tax is that it will be rolled out so slowly and over such a
long period that individual cases like this will seem few and far between. You will
hear, what appears to be, the odd case, from time to time: a suicide here and
an eviction there. The point is to make it seem as insignificant as I have portrayed
it when of course the reality is very different with people’s lives being torn
apart. As a result the solidarity won’t be as easy to come by as if the
government launched its assault on everyone simultaneously.
Consequently cases like poor Mrs
Bottrill will be further traduced by an already biased media. Comments from the
government and the disgraceful ‘Lord’ Freud refuse to engage with the issue
citing the tired cliché of not being able to speak on individual cases, or that
it would be ‘inappropriate’ to do anything more than offer, with breathtaking
hypocrisy, condolences. That itself represents a stunning psychopathy: I can’t
remember the last time I heard of a murderer offering condolences while
continuing to act.
To defeat this government there
must be solidarity and there must be action. These are not isolated cases where
the failings of the individual are more pertinent than the horrible policies of
a vile government. This is just more divide and rule: separate the weaker
members of the herd and isolate them – even in death.
Thank you for telling it like it is - Mrs Bottrill was murdered. This wretched government is deliberately making the poor even poorer, with all the implications that come with that, so yes, this government is guilty of murdering its own citizens.
ReplyDeleteTories kill.
No problem.
DeleteThis government knew what it was doing. The council as well along with the housing people all knew this was going to happen to someone. They knew this lady was struggling and would struggle. They must have known she was vulnerable. If they did not they are even worse. They are complicit in a deliberate policy and strategy that has directly contributed to this.